Skip to main content

Drawing parallels


I am a liberal arts major from The Evergreen State College, where I studied photography and art history. My favorite photography instructor, Bob, made critiques a regular part of the class structure. In addition to critiques he emphasized the importance of editing. Since joining Toastmasters in November 2016, I see similarities with photography and speaking (communicating). In this article I will be drawing two parallels between photography and Toastmasters: critique and editing.



Part I

On the importance of critique

Before I joined Bob's class, I hadn't experienced someone else "dissecting" my work. The first time the class critiqued my work I was initially surprised by the truth. My classmate said everything I had internalized while creating the photos - that they were lacking substance. Lacking content.

Sure, the photos were developed perfectly and they were in focus, but the content just wasn't there, and I knew it all along. "I just don't get it. There's nothing here. What am I looking at?! This does absolutely nothing for me," she said. She was right. There wasn't anything there. It was then that I realized the importance of critique; if she and others wouldn't have spoken up, who knows where I'd be!

This applies to not only art and photography but to communication and speaking as well. One can have the best delivery, body language, eye contact and vocal variety but if the content or message is lacking then the overall speech quality is likely to drop. The audience gets a fake veneer of a speech that's empty inside. Next time you set out to create a piece of art or a speech, start from the heart. That's where passion resides. If we do this, our content will shine and become a gift for the audience.

Evaluations at Toastmasters are a critical element of our club meetings; they give the evaluator an opportunity to flex their evaluator muscles of describing exactly why a speech is successful...or not. If no one "calls you out" on your performance, you will face a longer road to improvement and growth. If your evaluator says things that you yourself were thinking, it only reinforces and makes obvious the areas you need to work on.


Part II

On editing your work

After printing my contact sheets (photography thumbnails) in the darkroom, Bob would take his white wax pencil from behind his ear and circle the strongest images. He would describe to me what he saw in the thumbnails - explaining which images were the strongest and weakest and why. Knowing what made images successful, I began to start editing images on my own.

When preparing for a Toastmasters speech, the same rule applies when it comes to editing. First, you go in the darkroom (your mind) and think about what you might want to say. Many ideas will surface, but not all can be incorporated into your speech. When you come out with your developed ideas, you still need to take that white wax pencil and only take the cream of the crop.

Since most speeches are only 5-7 minutes, the content must be succinct, well-crafted and carefully edited in order to give the audience your message in a clear, focused manner. If you leave in poorly cropped ideas or out-of-focus notions, it will make your content suffer.

Next time you go to prepare a speech, just remember that critiques and editing are what improve our skills. Without them our end product won't live up to its true potential. At Confidence Builders, we help each other live up to our own true potential in a supportive space...while having fun and creating lasting relationships!

Popular posts from this blog

Idea generation

Explore books related to generating new ideas The Psychology Book , DK This is a book that isn't a cover novel but a reference if you are looking for something interesting to talk about in terms of human behavior. Referring to this book is a great way to read up psychology studies in a brief fashion.  It starts at the beginning to philosophical times before scientific approaches emerged. Towards the end, it goes into fields of psychology that are relatively new such as optimistic psychology, social psychology, and logotherapy.  50 Psychology Classics , Tom Butler - Bowden This book covers the top 50 most influential studies in psychology, which is what is discussed in your typical psych 101 courses. Not meant to be a cover to cover read but as a reference for ideas, or genuine interest. Studies learned in this book and "the psychology book" can be applied in real life context. Overall this is a useful guide. 48 Laws Of Power , Robert Greene Hard to read...

An Introvert's Toastmasters Journey

Image by Silvarita from Pixabay I gave a cringe-worthy presentation about a month after I joined  Toastmasters . The eyes were my downfall. It didn't occur to me then to practice my speech in front of my fellow Toastmasters. However, I had a chance to redeem myself. A couple of months after the appalling speech, I learned that I would be giving a talk at the National Weather Association's 44th Annual Meeting . Me needing help was an understatement. Children are great motivators. During my first Toastmasters meeting, I politely passed up several opportunities to participate. At my second meeting, I had another chance to take part. Like the first time, I passed it up. I was too nervous. It took a little girl named Philippa to encourage me to speak at the next meeting. What did she do? She stood in front of a group of adults and gave a short talk! The following week, I gave my Ice Breaker Speech on how I became interested in meteorology.  After the Ice Breaker ...

The Four Communication Styles

Everyone has a signature style of communicating.  The most effective communicators tailor their style to fit their audience! Director : Directors are hard-charging, want information in quick, bottom line bullet points, are action-oriented leaders, focused on results. The director’s style of communicating is assertive and task-oriented. The Director’s style is to assume that quick action and decisiveness yield the best results. Directors frame the world as a competitive place of action and decisiveness. Expresser : Expressers focus on leading through their creative ideas. They want a fuller exploration of different options and ideas. The expresser's style of communicating is assertive and people-oriented. Their operating assumption is that people should feel free to voice their opinions, think outside of the box, and articulate what they feel. They truly enjoy entertaining. Expressers focus on the world as an intricate place where people are acknowledged for their lifetime ...